Obama



By
Bill Press                                                                         
Read Spanish Version

History
is full of ironies, but none greater than this.

In
February 1989, then-Deputy CIA Director Robert Gates helped arm
freedom fighters in Afghanistan with cash, weapons and intelligence
to chase out Soviet troops. As Gates wrote in his memoirs, when the
last Soviet soldier left — ending an occupation that lasted nine
years, seven weeks, and three days — "Afghanistan was at last
free of the foreign invader."

Well,
not quite. Today, as President Obama’s secretary of defense, Gates is
helping send more American troops to Afghanistan, continuing a
presence that has already lasted seven and a half years and is
expected to outlast the Soviet occupation. The foreign invader is
back. For Americans, it’s good-bye Iraq and hello, Afghanistan.

For
Obama, they were always the bad war and the good war. During the
campaign, every time he criticized the war in Iraq, he lamented the
fact that we never did finish the war in Afghanistan.

It
should have come as no surprise, then, that soon after President
Obama ordered the winding down of the war in Iraq, he immediately
moved to ramp back up the war in Afghanistan. What is surprising,
though, is how many troops he’s sending, what their mission is, and
how long they’re likely to remain.

President
Obama has not only called for a significant widening of the war in
Afghanistan, he has also expanded U.S. military operations into
Pakistan. We are now fighting the war in both countries. And it is
Barack Obama’s war.

The
president unveiled his new policy the morning after receiving results
of the two-month review of Afghanistan he ordered shortly after
taking office. Earlier, even before the "review" began, he
had ordered an additional 17,000 troops to Afghanistan, increasing by
50 percent the number of American forces already on the ground.

On
March 27, Obama announced he was sending still 4,000 more troops to
Afghanistan, but only for the purpose of training the Afghan military
(sound familiar?). An administration spokesman later said the
president would decide this fall whether to send an additional 10,000
troops, growing American forces from 34,000 today to over 65,000 by
the end of the year.

At
the same time, Obama spelled out his new mission for American forces:
"So I want the American people to understand that we have a
clear and focused goal: to disrupt, dismantle and defeat al-Qaida in
Pakistan and Afghanistan." Note the mention of both countries.
It’s now being called the "Af-Pak Strategy." And it raises
even more questions: What’s the exit strategy? Can we win this war?
What constitutes victory? So far, no answers.

Granted,
al-Qaida still poses a serious threat to the United States. When we
turned our attention to Iraq, al-Qaida never went away. In fact, it
profited from our excursion into Iraq in order to recruit, regroup,
rearm and relocate in both countries. And you cannot shut down
terrorists in Afghanistan as long as they enjoy safe havens just over
the border in Pakistan.

Does
that mean we are also sending American troops to Pakistan? The
administration says no. But if not, how are we going to "disrupt,
dismantle and defeat" al-Qaida in Pakistan? When asked that
question on my radio show, experts say we’ll depend on a combination
of the Pakistani government and unmanned drones.

Get
serious. Over the last eight years, the leaders of Pakistan, despite
$11 billion in American aid, have done nothing about terrorism but
look the other way while al-Qaida and the Taliban took over territory
on the Afghan-Pakistan border. Do we really expect them now to rush
in and clean out terrorists? And if we can wipe out al-Qaida in
Pakistan by aerial bombs only, why send any more troops to
Afghanistan? Send more drones instead.

The
whole Af-Pak strategy just doesn’t add up. Before we blindly veer
from one endless war to the next, Americans would do well to take a
long look at history. As Secretary Gates knows better than anyone,
Afghanistan is known as "the graveyard of empires."

Alexander
the Great, Genghis Kahn, the British and the Soviet Union all
attempted to control Afghanistan and left in humiliation. We’re
kidding ourselves if we believe we can succeed where they failed.

Bill
Press is host of a nationally syndicated radio show and author of a
new book, "Train Wreck: The End of the Conservative Revolution
(and Not a Moment Too Soon)." You can hear "The Bill Press
Show" at his Web site: billpressshow.com. His email address is:
bill@billpress.com.

(c)
2009 Tribune Media Services, Inc.