In unanimous ruling, Mexican Supreme Court decriminalizes abortion
From Common Dreams
Standing in stark contrast with a newly effective anti-abortion law in neighboring Texas, Mexico’s Supreme Court on Tuesday unanimously ruled that a state law criminalizing abortion is unconstitutional, setting a precedent that advocates say is likely to ultimately lead to full legalization in the nation with the world’s second-largest Roman Catholic population.
The Washington Post reports Mexico’s high court found that a law in the northern state of Coahuila punishing women who have abortions with three years’ imprisonment violates the nation’s constitution. Women jailed for undergoing the procedure may now be freed following the decision.
“Today is a historic day for the rights of all Mexican women,” Supreme Court Chief Justice Arturo Zaldivar said after the ruling was announced. “It is a watershed in the history of the rights of all women, especially the most vulnerable.”
Justice Ana Margarita Ríos Farjat wrote:
In light of the Constitution, which does not prohibit abortion, can the state punish it? By punishing it, the state sanctions a behavior rooted in a series of rights possessed by women and by people with the capacity to bear children, and who participate in the decision to abort, such as the right to human dignity, autonomy, and free development of the personality; to legal equality, health, and reproductive freedom. In other words, sanctioning the voluntary interruption of pregnancy implies a limit to all these human rights.
“The pregnant person is criminalized, without it being constitutionally defined if life is invariably protected from conception, and what is the treatment of the embryo in the legal world,” she added.
While Tuesday’s ruling does not legalize abortion nationwide, it establishes precedent that reproductive rights advocates say they will use to challenge laws criminalizing the procedure in 29 of Mexico’s 32 states. Only Oaxaca, Hidalgo, and Veracruz, plus Mexico City, have legalized or decriminalized abortion.
The court’s decision follows years of grassroots organizing by feminist and human rights groups.
“The wave turned out to be a green tide,” tweeted attorney and activist Estefanía Veloz, referring to the color synonymous with the campaign for safe and legal abortion in Latin America. “[This is] for all the women who died in clandestine abortions, for my friends who could not choose their motherhood, and for the girls who will grow up in a freer country.”
Rebeca Ramos, executive director of the reproductive rights organization GIRE, called the court’s decision “an enormous step toward legalization in the entire country.”
“We are absolutely ready to present legal challenges to the denial of safe and legal abortion,” Ramos told The New York Times.
Jamie L. Manson, president of the U.S. group Catholics for Choice, said in a statement that “this decision is a resounding victory for the fundamental values of Catholic social teaching, particularly respect for human dignity, liberation, and preferential treatment of the poor.”
“It is also a monumental step forward for the rights of women and all pregnant people in Mexico,” added Manson, “and it sends a hopeful signal to the scores of reproductive justice advocates working hard to win similar freedoms in countries across Latin America.”
Observers noted that while nations including Mexico and Argentina have recently taken major steps to advance reproductive rights, numerous U.S. states with Republican-controlled legislatures have moved aggressively to severely restrict abortion access.
“Here in the United States, we are confronting unprecedented, extreme abortion bans in states like Texas, and our majority-Catholic U.S. Supreme Court presents a possible threat to the future of abortion rights,” said Manson. “With reproductive freedom in mortal danger, we look to the brave activists across our southern border for strength and inspiration.”
On Tuesday, United Nations experts condemned Texas’ new law—which bans abortions after six weeks of pregnancy and allows no exceptions for victims of rape or incest—as a violation of international law.
Reem Alsalem, the U.N.’s independent monitor on violence against women, said that by refusing to block the law, the U.S. Supreme Court’s conservative justices have “chosen to trample on the protection of women’s reproductive rights, thereby exposing them and abortion providers to more violence.”
