Debate question on war in Middle East encapsulates what is wrong with US media coverage
Foreign policy experts and civil rights groups criticized CBS News‘ moderators following Monday night’s vice presidential debate for asking only one narrowly framed question about conflict in the Middle East.
Co-moderator Margaret Brennan, the network’s chief foreign affairs correspondent, opened the debate by stating that Iran could develop a nuclear weapon within a week or two and asking if the two vice presidential candidates would support a preemptive strike by Israel on Iran.
“Wait. What?” Kelley Beaucar Vlahos, a senior adviser for the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft, a think tank, wrote in response to the question.
Vlahos expressed disbelief that “after nearly 12 months of war in Gaza, more than 40,000 dead—mostly civilians—a spiraling humanitarian crisis, hostages dead or still in captivity, Hezbollah and Hamas leaders assassinated, a new war in Lebanon where 1 million people may be displaced, charges of genocide, and a cease-fire endlessly elusive,” this was the question CBS had chosen.
Peter Beinart, an editor at Jewish Currents and professor of journalism at the City University of New York, argued that the question should have focused on how to stop a regional war, writing on social media that CBS‘s framing “pretty much encapsulates what is wrong with U.S. media coverage of this conflict.”
The Council on American–Islamic Relations, a Muslim civil rights group, said the question was “reckless and biased” and “sounded like it could have written by [the American Israel Public Affairs Committee], not CBS.”
The debate took place on the same day that Iran fired roughly 200 ballistic missiles at Israel. Iran said the strikes were retaliation for recent Israeli assassinations of Hamas and Hezbollah leaders. The strikes followed Israel’s launch of a ground incursion into southern Lebanon. Israeli and U.S. forces intercepted the vast majority of the missiles, which were targeted at military facilities.
Vlahos suggested that focusing on the Iran threat was a way of avoiding larger questions—that Brennan’s narrow framing was intentional.
“If the CBS moderators wanted to avoid talking frankly about the aforementioned issues which might mean—here it comes—raising criticism of Israel, this was the way to do it,” she wrote. “Make it all about Iran.”
Sen. JD Vance (R-Ohio), the Republican vice presidential candidate, said that he would defer to Israel.
“We should support our allies wherever they are when they’re fighting the bad guys,” he said.
Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, the Democratic vice presidential nominee, didn’t directly answer the preemptive strike question but immediately invoked the October 7 massacre of Israelis by Hamas and said Israel had the “absolutely fundamental” right to defend itself.
